Re: [RFC/PATCH 04/11] ref-filter: add 'ifexists' atom

From: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Date: Jul 28, 2015, 17:39 UTC
Message-ID: <CAOLa=ZQ7Tc=73BFS_p5Dqnjn-SWhfJ6fqKyCOf71Mrj=puTjOg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <vpq7fpk1x9a.fsf@anie.imag.fr>

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> wrote:

Show 31 quoted lines

> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> --- a/t/t6302-for-each-ref-filter.sh
>> +++ b/t/t6302-for-each-ref-filter.sh
>> @@ -149,4 +149,25 @@ test_expect_success 'check `colornext` format option' '
>>       test_cmp expect actual
>>  '
>>
>> +test_expect_success 'check `ifexists` format option' '
>> +     cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
>> +     [foo1.10]
>> +     [foo1.3]
>> +     [foo1.6]
>> +     EOF
>> +     git for-each-ref --format="%(ifexists:[%s])%(refname:short)" | grep "foo" >actual &&
>> +     test_cmp expect actual
>> +'
>
> You're testing only the positive case of ifexists, right? You need a
> test for the negative case (i.e. the attribute does not exist) too.
> Ideally, check that the ifexist actually applies to the right attribute,
> like
>
> --format '%(ifexist:<%s>)%(attribute1) %(ifexist:[%s])%(attribute2)'
>
> and manage to get an output like
>
> <foo>
>  [bar]
> <foobar> [barfoo]
>

Yes! this seems like an important test, thanks :)

>
> You have a double || that is not useful. Not really harmful either, but
> it may distract the reader. You may want to s/||/|/.
>

Will change!

-- 
Regards,
Karthik Nayak