Re: [PATCH 3/5] make git-bugreport a builtin

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> > Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> >
> >>     macros). That could change eventually of course, but it's not like
> >>     switching back to a stand-alone at that point is a big deal.
> >
> > If it is not a big deal, then I am fine, but at the same time it
> > becomes unclear why we can say "we can use X and Y niceties only
> > available for builtins".
>
> Actually, there is another issue that is potentially a lot worse.
>
> "git bugreport" not being built-in would mean that the compiled-in
> git-version MUST not be relied upon (it merely is a version of the
> source "git bugreport" came from, it does not necessarily match the
> main "git" binary when we are dealing with a confused user with
> GIT_EXEC_PATH problem), but has to be asked to "git" binary on the
> $PATH externally.  That needs to be done for any non-builtin
> binaries (e.g. when user is having issue with git-remote--curl")
> anyway, keeping "git bugreport" out of builtin would force us the
> necessary discipline from early on.