Re: [PATCH 3/5] make git-bugreport a builtin

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > Where do we want to go with this? After the discussion and sleeping on
> > it, I'm still of the mind that we should generally default things to
> > being builtins unless there's an immediate need not to do so (like
> > extra link dependencies). But I don't care _too_ much, so I'd rather
> > eject this patch and move forward with the rest of the series if it's a
> > sticking point. Thoughts?
> 
> I already said what needs to be said.

> I do not care too deeply what we do now today either way, as long as
> people remember that we are interested in the version string, build
> options and external library versions of the "git" binary (for
> built-ins) and non-built-in binaries (like the remote helpers), and
> not as much interested in these traits of the "git-bugreport" binary
> itself, when we need to split "bugreport" out of builtins in the
> future.