Re: confusion over the new branch and merge config
- From
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 2, 2007, 20:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <enef73$467$1@sea.gmane.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v1wmdure6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> Obviously, the local names should matter more when you are doing > local operations. So if you are using mergeLocal to give a > shorthand to "git merge" that does not explicitly say what to > merge, the above discussion does not apply. But if that is the > case, mergeLocal should also not affect the selection of > branches to be merged when "git pull" happens from a remote > either.
You can always use remote = ".", and then remote and local branches are the same...
-- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git