Re: confusion over the new branch and merge config

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Dec 22, 2006, 08:21 UTC
Message-ID: <7vfyb85ojf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <200612220750.49644.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>

Alan Chandler <alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> writes:

> And according to the man page git branch -r should print ONLY the remote 
> branches

Heh, sounds like you spotted a bug -- patches welcome (or I'll fix it myself if I get around to it before everybody else). Thanks.

Show 9 quoted lines

>> > $ git checkout origin/next
>> > git checkout: to checkout the requested commit you need to specify
>> >               a name for a new branch which is created and switched
>
> What about the error message saying that origin/next is read only.  
> Something like
>
> git-checkout: the requested commit is on a remote read only branch.  You 
> need to specify a new local branch with the -b option to proceed.

I agree that explicitly suggesting the use of -b is a good idea, but your wording is a bit too specific; after all you might do

	$ H=`git-rev-parse origin/next`
        $ git checkout $H

and there is not enough information to say "is on a remote read only branch". We could do that with more specific hacks in git-checkout; patches welcome.