Re: confusion over the new branch and merge config
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Dec 23, 2006, 07:11 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vy7ozt7c9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061223062801.GA5415@segfault.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Yes, my proposed syntax means you have to have a tracking branch. But > does it really make sense for people to put entries in their config > file, but not have a tracking branch? What do people use non-tracking > branch pulls for, anyway? I would assume for one-off pulls of > infrequently used repositories, in which case they're always saying > "git-pull git://path/to/repo foo:bar".
Not at all. I pull from gitk repository and I do not have tracking branch, but I still have a remote defined for it.