Re: confusion over the new branch and merge config
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Dec 26, 2006, 07:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061226073346.GA22218@segfault.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612241544250.18171@xanadu.home>
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 03:49:50PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Show 5 quoted lines
> What would be nice as well is to be able to provide only the _name_ of > the tracking branch without the refs/remotes/$origin/ prefix. Since > there is already a 'branch."blah".remote = $origin' entry, then having > 'branch."blah".merge = $foo' could mean "refs/remotes/$origin/$foo" when > $foo contains no slash.
NAK. That makes branch names like "jc/foo" second-class citizens. You would do better to say "entries without refs/ are implicitly local refs in refs/remotes/".
-Peff