Re: confusion over the new branch and merge config
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Dec 23, 2006, 06:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vbqlvuoi4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20061223051210.GA29814@segfault.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 6 quoted lines
> BTW, is there some explanation why branch.*.merge specifies a _remote_ > head? The following would make much more sense to me: > > [branch "master"] > remote = origin > merge = refs/remotes/origin/master
Only *if* you store it in that tracking branch. The name the other party gives _do_ matter to you anyway, because you have to _know_ it to fetch. What it does NOT matter is if you use a tracking branch, or if you do, which local tracking branch you use to track it.