Re: confusion over the new branch and merge config
- From
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
- Date
- Dec 24, 2006, 20:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612241544250.18171@xanadu.home>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vbqlvrldk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> If you (or other people) use branch.*.merge, with its value set > to remote name _and_ local name, and actually verify that either > form works without confusion, please report back and I'll apply.
This is nice, thanks.
What would be nice as well is to be able to provide only the _name_ of the tracking branch without the refs/remotes/$origin/ prefix. Since there is already a 'branch."blah".remote = $origin' entry, then having 'branch."blah".merge = $foo' could mean "refs/remotes/$origin/$foo" when $foo contains no slash.
Nicolas