Re: confusion over the new branch and merge config
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Lars Hjemli wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On 12/22/06, Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thursday 2006 December 21 22:17, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > > $ git branch -r
> > > * master
> > > origin/HEAD
> > > origin/html
> > > origin/maint
> > > origin/man
> > > origin/master
> > > origin/next
> > > origin/pu
> > > origin/todo
> >
> > I'm trying to track down why "master" is being shown in this case";
>
> This looks very much like "git branch -a".
Yes it was. I just pasted the wrong line in my example. Sorry.
Nicolas
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>