Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From
Mike Ralphson <mike.ralphson@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 16, 2008, 14:22 UTC
- Message-ID
- <e2b179460805160722x654d80e0s2e37c4fa04ef0a27@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vr6c3h4eb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
2008/5/15 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> I'd prefer heterogeneous automated test coverage to be on 'next' and > 'master'. If the coverage extends to 'maint' that would be nicer... >
Do you have any interest in seeing the results of these automated builds? I'm thinking specifically of the case where you're about to tag a final release...
Obviously I'll shout on the list if/when we get a breakage.
An example of a tracking fork with the build/pass tags pushed to it is at http://repo.or.cz/w/git/gitbuild.git - unfortunately as the branches are significant, the mob approach doesn't really work, so if anyone else would like to push tags to this repo, please just ask.
Mike