Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- May 15, 2008, 11:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080515112319.GA13038@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080515112030.GA12781@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 07:20:30AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> I have started tagging my auto-builds as you suggest. It should be easy > enough to push to a repo.or.cz repository. Although I'm not sure of the > utility of auto-publishing this information. Who is going to look at it?
Also, if there is interest in an automated "this is now broken on platform X", I think the interesting thing is not "what was the last passing state" but rather "what is the output of 'make test' for the failing state." So:
> I had assumed a workflow more like "it passes 99% of the time; in the > remaining 1%, the cron job kicks off a message to the owning user, who > then investigates and/or writes a bug report to the list."
In that case, I think the interesting automation is making a problem report from a failed case.
-Peff