Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From
Mike Ralphson <mike.ralphson@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 15, 2008, 10:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <e2b179460805150316n77513037y5409042b01170d4e@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <e2b179460805131110k3cf582fdn9b8bd31046b90ca7@mail.gmail.com>
2008/5/13 Mike Ralphson <mike.ralphson@gmail.com>:
> Thanks - that was a helpful spur to action. I'll check tomorrow how it > fairs pulling, building, running the tests etc. I've added a couple of > 'try git tag -f's to it, so I have KNOWN_BUILDING and KNOWN_PASSING > points to pass quickly into bisect if necessary.
My KNOWN_BUILDING and KNOWN_PASSING tags are now happily chasing each other up the commit log.
Which branch(es) would it be most useful on which to have this automated build/test cycle?
Although the list of tags might get slightly unwieldy (i.e. the top commit will gain a lot of tags if all is well), with a sensible naming convention, these tags could be pushed to a central repo (a regularly updated clone of git.git) allowing easy visibility of the current state of the 'build collective'.
Something like {intials}_{uname info}_{branch}_KNOWN_{BUILDING|PASSING} ?Mike