Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2008, 09:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080428094119.GA20499@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <B287EA35-6C5D-4A5A-BEF1-C55A70D913ED@silverinsanity.com>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 11:32:24AM -0400, Brian Gernhardt wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Eh, not everyone's perfect. I would have used `rev` instead of `tac` and > still been wrong for Solaris. But it seems that the `wc -l` whitespace > issue seems to hit nearly everyone at some point, so I thought it would be > a good candidate for CodingStyle. > > Personally, I'd love to have the time to review all the patches to catch > these issues while still on the list instead of waiting until they hit > next and I tried to compile it. But I don't always notice, have time, or > care myself.
BTW, how did you discover this bug? Through normal use, or was there a failing test?
If a failing test, then I wonder if we could get a few people to set up automated tests on alternate platforms. IIRC, Junio makes sure that master always passes test on his Linux box and KO (Debian and Redhat, I think?). Other platforms could "git pull && make test" daily. I could probably do Solaris (once I get the tests to complete pass at all!) and FreeBSD 6.
-Peff