Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 27, 2008, 17:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vej8rgq62.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0804271620440.16320@eeepc-johanness>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> ... It did not > help that I hated the fact that that series changed the original design > without even understanding it.
Care to elaborate on this point further? I do not get it.
Do you mean to say "I hate it because it does things differently from how I did it originally", or "Because it does things differently from how the original did, it breaks this and that cases"?
If the latter, "this and that" part is especially useful. A solution to fix that may end up to be closer to the original implementation.