Re: [PATCH 12/18] Disallow demoting grave fsck errors to warnings
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Dec 22, 2014, 21:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.1412222254250.21312@s15462909.onlinehome-server.info>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqd27ridl0.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Hi Junio,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > Some kinds of errors are intrinsically unrecoverable (e.g. errors while > > uncompressing objects). It does not make sense to allow demoting them to > > mere warnings. > > Makes sense, but the patch makes it look as if this is an "oops, we > should have done the list in patch 02/18 in this order from the > beginning". Can we reorder the patches?
I considered this already, but it would more be like a squash than a reordering. And when I squashed the patches, the story did not read as clearly to me as it does now. However, if you think this argument is too weak, I will squash them.
Is it too weak?
Ciao, Dscho