Re: [PATCH 07/49] builtin/repack.c: avoid "the_hash_algo" in `write_oid()`

From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Date: Sep 29, 2025, 23:21 UTC
Message-ID: <aNsUZtGst4MguEXq@pks.im>
In-Reply-To: <37a7dea848f9618f7243fd9ff8ed704adfb3cf4e.1759097191.git.me@ttaylorr.com>

On Sun, Sep 28, 2025 at 06:07:37PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote:

Show 21 quoted lines

> diff --git a/builtin/repack.c b/builtin/repack.c
> index 094f5a0cc2..7d62959dc2 100644
> --- a/builtin/repack.c
> +++ b/builtin/repack.c
> @@ -413,6 +419,7 @@ static void repack_promisor_objects(struct repository *repo,
>  				    const struct pack_objects_args *args,
>  				    struct string_list *names)
>  {
> +	struct write_oid_context ctx;
>  	struct child_process cmd = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
>  	FILE *out;
>  	struct strbuf line = STRBUF_INIT;
> @@ -427,7 +434,9 @@ static void repack_promisor_objects(struct repository *repo,
>  	 * {type -> existing pack order} ordering when computing deltas instead
>  	 * of a {type -> size} ordering, which may produce better deltas.
>  	 */
> -	for_each_packed_object(repo, write_oid, &cmd,
> +	ctx.cmd = &cmd;
> +	ctx.algop = repo->hash_algo;
> +	for_each_packed_object(repo, write_oid, &ctx,
>  			       FOR_EACH_OBJECT_PROMISOR_ONLY);

As this one is essentially new code, and we have all of the info available right at the start of the problem. Do we maybe want to use designated initializers?

Patrick