Re: [PATCH 1/3] cherry-pick: add support to copy notes

From: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Date: May 29, 2013, 08:40 UTC
Message-ID: <87y5ayqivi.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s3vkJCr2f2zsZU++j4Wqxuefmpt8BQ9dJoP=JtTB=rgkQ@mail.gmail.com>

Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:

Show 9 quoted lines

> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 3:09 AM, Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> Feel free to implement that. I'm just interested in 'git cherry-pick' being
>>> usable for 'git rebase' purposes.
>>
>> Which would have been obvious to all but the most casual readers, eh?
>
> My motivations are irrelevant, the patch is good as it is.

You fooled both Junio (AFAICT anyway) and me, who both reviewed the patch under the assumption that it implements note copying *along the lines of existing note copying*. This proved to be a wrong, and time-wasting, assumption.

I think all the points in this discussion have been made in the lengthy thread about remote-{bzr,hg} already. So much so in fact that your continuing defiance of the project standards, knowing that they will elicit exactly this response, amounts to trolling.

So until this changes, my $0.02 is a blanket NAK and a refusal to spend my time reviewing.

-- 
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch