Re: [PATCH v3 14/34] fsmonitor--daemon: implement 'start' command

From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Jul 20, 2021, 19:38 UTC
Message-ID: <87tukovidd.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <55e15a7a-b15e-78bd-b3c3-4adff3363edd@jeffhostetler.com>

On Tue, Jul 13 2021, Jeff Hostetler wrote:

Show 112 quoted lines

> On 7/13/21 1:54 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 13 2021, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
>> 
>>> My response here is in addition to Dscho's remarks on this topic.
>>> He makes excellent points that I'll just #include here.  I do want
>>> to add my own $0.02 here.
>>>
>>> On 7/1/21 6:18 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 01 2021, Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget wrote:
>>>>
>
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * This is adapted from `wait_or_whine()`.  Watch the child process and
>>>>> + * let it get started and begin listening for requests on the socket
>>>>> + * before reporting our success.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +static int wait_for_background_startup(pid_t pid_child)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +	int status;
>>>>> +	pid_t pid_seen;
>>>>> +	enum ipc_active_state s;
>>>>> +	time_t time_limit, now;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	time(&time_limit);
>>>>> +	time_limit += fsmonitor__start_timeout_sec;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	for (;;) {
>>>>> +		pid_seen = waitpid(pid_child, &status, WNOHANG);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +		if (pid_seen == -1)
>>>>> +			return error_errno(_("waitpid failed"));
>>>>> +		else if (pid_seen == 0) {
>>>>> +			/*
>>>>> +			 * The child is still running (this should be
>>>>> +			 * the normal case).  Try to connect to it on
>>>>> +			 * the socket and see if it is ready for
>>>>> +			 * business.
>>>>> +			 *
>>>>> +			 * If there is another daemon already running,
>>>>> +			 * our child will fail to start (possibly
>>>>> +			 * after a timeout on the lock), but we don't
>>>>> +			 * care (who responds) if the socket is live.
>>>>> +			 */
>>>>> +			s = fsmonitor_ipc__get_state();
>>>>> +			if (s == IPC_STATE__LISTENING)
>>>>> +				return 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +			time(&now);
>>>>> +			if (now > time_limit)
>>>>> +				return error(_("fsmonitor--daemon not online yet"));
>>>>> +		} else if (pid_seen == pid_child) {
>>>>> +			/*
>>>>> +			 * The new child daemon process shutdown while
>>>>> +			 * it was starting up, so it is not listening
>>>>> +			 * on the socket.
>>>>> +			 *
>>>>> +			 * Try to ping the socket in the odd chance
>>>>> +			 * that another daemon started (or was already
>>>>> +			 * running) while our child was starting.
>>>>> +			 *
>>>>> +			 * Again, we don't care who services the socket.
>>>>> +			 */
>>>>> +			s = fsmonitor_ipc__get_state();
>>>>> +			if (s == IPC_STATE__LISTENING)
>>>>> +				return 0;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +			/*
>>>>> +			 * We don't care about the WEXITSTATUS() nor
>>>>> +			 * any of the WIF*(status) values because
>>>>> +			 * `cmd_fsmonitor__daemon()` does the `!!result`
>>>>> +			 * trick on all function return values.
>>>>> +			 *
>>>>> +			 * So it is sufficient to just report the
>>>>> +			 * early shutdown as an error.
>>>>> +			 */
>>>>> +			return error(_("fsmonitor--daemon failed to start"));
>>>>> +		} else
>>>>> +			return error(_("waitpid is confused"));
>>>>> +	}
>>>>> +}
>>>> Ditto this. could we extend the wait_or_whine() function (or some
>>>> extended version thereof) to do what you need with callbacks?
>>>> It seems the main difference is just being able to pass down a flag
>>>> for
>>>> waitpid(), and the loop needing to check EINTR or not depending on
>>>> whether WNOHANG is passed.
>>>> For e.g. the "We don't care about the WEXITSTATUS()" you'd get that
>>>> behavior with an adjusted wait_or_whine(). Wouldn't it be better to
>>>> report what exit status it exits with e.g. if the top-level process is
>>>> signalled? We do so in trace2 for other things we spawn...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Again, I don't want to mix my usage here with the existing code
>>> and destabilize all existing callers.  Here we are spinning to give
>>> the child a chance to *start* and confirm that it is in a listening
>>> state and ready for connections.  We do not wait for the child to
>>> exit (unless it dies quickly without becoming ready).
>>>
>>> We want to end our wait as soon as we confirm that the child is
>>> ready and return.  All I really need from the system is `waitpid()`.
>> Will this code behave correctly if the daemon we start is signalled
>> per
>> the WIFSIGNALED() cases the code this is derived handles, but this does
>> not?
>
> We're only waiting until the child gets started and is able to receive
> requests -- what happens to it after we have confirmed that it is ready
> is not our concern (after all, the parent is about to exit anyway and
> the child is going to continue on).
>
> If waitpid() gives us a WIFSIGNALED (or any other WIF*() state) before
> we have spoken to it, we will return a "failed to start".

So in wait_or_whine() and finish_command() we capture all of that in trace2 logs, we explicitly don't want that in this case? We do concern ourselves with the exact exit status/signal status etc. of children we start in most other scenarios for trace2 logging purposes.

Show 22 quoted lines

> But again, that signal would have to arrive immediately after we spawned
> it and *before* we could talk to it.  If the child is signaled after we
> confirmed it was ready, we don't care because the parent process will be
> gone.
>
> (If the child is signaled or is killed (or crashes or whatever), the
> next Git command (like "status") that tries to talk to it will re-start
> it implicitly -- the `git fsmonitor--daemon start` command here is an
> explicit start.)
>
>
>> But sure, I just meant to point out that the flip side to
>> "destabilize
>> all existing callers" is reviewing new code that may be subtly buggy,
>> and those subtle bugs (if any) would be smoked out if we were forced to
>> extend run-command.c, i.e. to use whatever feature(s) this needs for all
>> existing callers.
>> 
>
> That would/could have a massive footprint.  And I've already established
> that my usage here is sufficiently different from existing uses that the
> result would be a mess. IMHO.

I hadn't see this before but it seems pretty much exactly the same code was already added (by you) in 36a7eb68760 (t0052: add simple-ipc tests and t/helper/test-simple-ipc tool, 2021-03-22), perhaps splitting it into a utility function for the two to use with a callback mechanism would reduce the footprint?

What I was suggesting was some continuation of the below.

(I stopped once I noticed the changes I was making to builtin/fsmonitor--daemon.c didn't even compile (almost the entire file is hidden behind a macro), but I've commented on that aspect elsewhere. I.e. it's nice to be able to do tree-wide refactoring without tripping over code hidden by ifdefs)

It passes all current tests for whatever that's worth, obviously not a pretty API, and I'm not claiming it's correct.

But I think it's clear how the trace2/error handling part of it could be further extracted into some utility, so this would just be a mode of run-command.

Not saying you need to do it, but the comments about us explicitly not caring at all about the exit state make me wonder if there's some reason for why someone else would be tripping over some landmine if they did that refactoring.

Anyway, just a thought. I see from other feedback that you seem to be getting pretty exasperated with me.

I'm just trying to help this along, usually being able to piggy-back on existing in-tree code and proving the correctness by passing all in-tree tests with that piggy-backing helps more than hinders.

diff --git a/builtin/fsmonitor--daemon.c b/builtin/fsmonitor--daemon.c
index 25f18f2726b..7365fff95f4 100644
--- a/builtin/fsmonitor--daemon.c
+++ b/builtin/fsmonitor--daemon.c
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
 #include "simple-ipc.h"
 #include "khash.h"
 #include "pkt-line.h"
+#include "run-command.h"
 
 static const char * const builtin_fsmonitor__daemon_usage[] = {
 	N_("git fsmonitor--daemon start [<options>]"),
@@ -1403,11 +1404,12 @@ static int wait_for_background_startup(pid_t pid_child)
 	time_limit += fsmonitor__start_timeout_sec;
 
 	for (;;) {
+		int saved_errno = 0;
+		code = wait_or_whine_extended(pid_child, &pid_seen, "TODO",
+					      0, WNOHANG, &saved_errno);
 		pid_seen = waitpid(pid_child, &status, WNOHANG);
 
-		if (pid_seen == -1)
-			return error_errno(_("waitpid failed"));
-		else if (pid_seen == 0) {
+		if (pid_seen == 0) {
 			/*
 			 * The child is still running (this should be
 			 * the normal case).  Try to connect to it on
@@ -1452,8 +1454,7 @@ static int wait_for_background_startup(pid_t pid_child)
 			 * early shutdown as an error.
 			 */
 			return error(_("fsmonitor--daemon failed to start"));
-		} else
-			return error(_("waitpid is confused"));
+		}
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/run-command.c b/run-command.c
index aacc336f951..856e7d87c40 100644
--- a/run-command.c
+++ b/run-command.c
@@ -543,24 +543,28 @@ static inline void set_cloexec(int fd)
 		fcntl(fd, F_SETFD, flags | FD_CLOEXEC);
 }
 
-static int wait_or_whine(pid_t pid, const char *argv0, int in_signal)
+int wait_or_whine_extended(pid_t pid, pid_t *waiting, const char *argv0,
+			   int in_signal, int waitpid_options, int *failed_errno)
 {
 	int status, code = -1;
-	pid_t waiting;
-	int failed_errno = 0;
 
-	while ((waiting = waitpid(pid, &status, 0)) < 0 && errno == EINTR)
+	if (waitpid_options & WNOHANG)
+		*waiting = waitpid(pid, &status, waitpid_options);
+	else
+		while ((*waiting = waitpid(pid, &status, waitpid_options)) < 0 &&
+		       errno == EINTR)
 		;	/* nothing */
+
 	if (in_signal) {
 		if (WIFEXITED(status))
 			code = WEXITSTATUS(status);
 		return code;
 	}
 
-	if (waiting < 0) {
-		failed_errno = errno;
+	if (*waiting < 0) {
+		*failed_errno = errno;
 		error_errno("waitpid for %s failed", argv0);
-	} else if (waiting != pid) {
+	} else if (*waiting != pid) {
 		error("waitpid is confused (%s)", argv0);
 	} else if (WIFSIGNALED(status)) {
 		code = WTERMSIG(status);
@@ -574,14 +578,23 @@ static int wait_or_whine(pid_t pid, const char *argv0, int in_signal)
 		code += 128;
 	} else if (WIFEXITED(status)) {
 		code = WEXITSTATUS(status);
+	} else if (waitpid_options & WNOHANG && *waiting == 0) {
+		code = 0;
 	} else {
 		error("waitpid is confused (%s)", argv0);
 	}
 
-	clear_child_for_cleanup(pid);
+	return code;
+}
 
+static int wait_or_whine(pid_t pid, const char *argv0, int in_signal)
+{
+	pid_t ignore;
+	int failed_errno = 0;
+	int ret = wait_or_whine_extended(pid, &ignore, argv0, in_signal, 0, &failed_errno);
+	clear_child_for_cleanup(pid);
 	errno = failed_errno;
-	return code;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static void trace_add_env(struct strbuf *dst, const char *const *deltaenv)
diff --git a/run-command.h b/run-command.h
index e321d23bbd2..fe39730f87a 100644
--- a/run-command.h
+++ b/run-command.h
@@ -182,6 +182,9 @@ void child_process_clear(struct child_process *);
 
 int is_executable(const char *name);
 
+int wait_or_whine_extended(pid_t pid, pid_t *waiting, const char *argv0,
+			   int in_signal, int waitpid_options, int *failed_errno);
+
 /**
  * Start a sub-process. Takes a pointer to a `struct child_process`
  * that specifies the details and returns pipe FDs (if requested).
diff --git a/t/helper/test-simple-ipc.c b/t/helper/test-simple-ipc.c
index 91345180750..44658a46713 100644
--- a/t/helper/test-simple-ipc.c
+++ b/t/helper/test-simple-ipc.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 #include "parse-options.h"
 #include "thread-utils.h"
 #include "strvec.h"
+#include "run-command.h"
 
 #ifndef SUPPORTS_SIMPLE_IPC
 int cmd__simple_ipc(int argc, const char **argv)
@@ -349,7 +350,7 @@ static int spawn_server(pid_t *pid)
  */
 static int wait_for_server_startup(pid_t pid_child)
 {
-	int status;
+	int code;
 	pid_t pid_seen;
 	enum ipc_active_state s;
 	time_t time_limit, now;
@@ -358,12 +359,10 @@ static int wait_for_server_startup(pid_t pid_child)
 	time_limit += cl_args.max_wait_sec;
 
 	for (;;) {
-		pid_seen = waitpid(pid_child, &status, WNOHANG);
-
-		if (pid_seen == -1)
-			return error_errno(_("waitpid failed"));
-
-		else if (pid_seen == 0) {
+		int saved_errno = 0;
+		code = wait_or_whine_extended(pid_child, &pid_seen, "TODO",
+					      0, WNOHANG, &saved_errno);
+		if (pid_seen == 0) {
 			/*
 			 * The child is still running (this should be
 			 * the normal case).  Try to connect to it on
@@ -384,9 +383,7 @@ static int wait_for_server_startup(pid_t pid_child)
 				return error(_("daemon not online yet"));
 
 			continue;
-		}
-
-		else if (pid_seen == pid_child) {
+		} else if (pid_seen == pid_child) {
 			/*
 			 * The new child daemon process shutdown while
 			 * it was starting up, so it is not listening
@@ -412,10 +409,9 @@ static int wait_for_server_startup(pid_t pid_child)
 			 * early shutdown as an error.
 			 */
 			return error(_("daemon failed to start"));
+		} else if (code) {
+			BUG("??");
 		}
-
-		else
-			return error(_("waitpid is confused"));
 	}
 }