Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] gitweb: git_split_heads_body function.
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Nov 15, 2008, 12:14 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vprkx5gqb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <200811150059.14515.jnareb@gmail.com>
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
> Second, this patch wouldn't do what you want from it if there are > remotes with '/' in name. I for example use "gsoc2008/gitweb-caching" > for Lea Wiemann repository with her GSoC 2008 work on adding caching > to gitweb.
I think your point is if you also use gsoc2008/gitstats from another remote repository, these two sets of remote tracking branches will be shown grouped together. But is it a bad thing? After all, you chose to use hierarchical names for them, _and_ you chose to use the same toplevel hierarchy name for them. Doesn't that mean you _wanted_ to have them both appear in the same GSoC 2008 group?