Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] gitweb: display remote heads

From: Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com>
Date: Nov 14, 2008, 18:37 UTC
Message-ID: <cb7bb73a0811141037o26532f34k6a3e0193cd06e79a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200811141533.15427.jnareb@gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:

Show 8 quoted lines

> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
>
>> This is a patchset I presented about a year ago or so, but after a lively
>> discussion it dropped into silence. I'm now presenting it again, with minor
>> cleanups and adjustements.
>
> That is very nice of you to resend this series. If you could provide
> link to earlier discussion of this series...

There was no actual discussion after I sent the series, although there was some while I was preparing it. Plus, gmane is quite unresponsive for me at the moment, but the whereabous of the past discussions are these http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2007/8/30/256411/thread

Show 16 quoted lines

>> Giuseppe Bilotta (11):
>>   gitweb: introduce remote_heads feature
>>   gitweb: git_get_heads_list accepts an optional list of refs.
>>   gitweb: separate heads and remotes list in summary view
>>   gitweb: optional custom name for refs in git_heads_body
>>   gitweb: git_split_heads_body function.
>>   gitweb: use CSS to style split head lists.
>>   gitweb: add 'remotes' action
>>   gitweb: display HEAD in heads list when detached
>>   gitweb: git_is_head_detached() function
>>   gitweb: add HEAD to list of shortlog refs if detached
>>   gitweb: CSS style and refs mark for detached HEAD
>
> I'll try to review individual patches, but I haven't examined them
> yet, so perhaps there is a reason why there are so many patches in
> this series?

And I actually squashed some! The original patchset was 14 patches. Now it's about 10, of which the first 6 as the actual remote heads stuff, and the last 4 are the detached HEAD stuff.

> Note that on GMane NNTP (news) interface I can see only two last
> patches. Could anyone not CC-ed confirm or deny if this is VGER
> anti-SPAM filter at work, or some GMane archive hiccup?

Seems to be a gmane problem, I can see it too.

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta