From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 12:14:04 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] gitweb: git_split_heads_body function.
Message-ID: <7vprkx5gqb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <200811150059.14515.jnareb@gmail.com>

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> Second, this patch wouldn't do what you want from it if there are
> remotes with '/' in name.  I for example use "gsoc2008/gitweb-caching"
> for Lea Wiemann repository with her GSoC 2008 work on adding caching
> to gitweb.

I think your point is if you also use gsoc2008/gitstats from another
remote repository, these two sets of remote tracking branches will be
shown grouped together.  But is it a bad thing?  After all, you chose to
use hierarchical names for them, _and_ you chose to use the same toplevel
hierarchy name for them.  Doesn't that mean you _wanted_ to have them both
appear in the same GSoC 2008 group?