Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts
- From
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Date
- Nov 15, 2006, 17:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <7vfyckoaju.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611151023160.2591@xanadu.home>
Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
> But again I think it is important that the URL to use must be a per > branch attribute i.e. attached to "default/master" and not just > "default". This way someone could add all branches of interest into the > "default" group even if they're from different repositories, and a > simple get without any argument would get them all.
I think the "one group per one remote repository" model is a lot easier to explain. At least when I read your first "branch group" proposal that was I thought was going on and I found it quite sensible (and it maps more or less straightforwardly to the way existing .git/refs/remotes is set up by default).