Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts
On 11/15/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 26 quoted lines
> Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> >> Yes. The current "merge" started its life as Linus's porcelain
> >> (we did not have fetch and pull infrastructure back then) but
> >> quickly has become just a helper for pull to produce a merge
> >> commit. If anybody thinks its UI is good as a general end-user
> >> level command, there is a need for "head examination".
> >
> > If you mean "git merge" it sure needs to be brought forward. It can't
> > be clearer than:
> >
> > git-merge the_other_branch
> >
> > or
> >
> > git-merge git://repo.com/time_machine.git
> >
> > to instantaneously understand what is going on.
>
> You mean
>
> git merge git://repo.com/time_machine.git#branch
>
> don't you (perhaps with 'master' as default branch)?
perhaps with remote 'HEAD' as default branch?