From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 17:59:49 GMT
Subject: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts
Message-ID: <7vfyckoaju.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611151023160.2591@xanadu.home>

Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> writes:

> But again I think it is important that the URL to use must be a per 
> branch attribute i.e. attached to "default/master" and not just 
> "default".  This way someone could add all branches of interest into the 
> "default" group even if they're from different repositories, and a 
> simple  get without any argument would get them all.

I think the "one group per one remote repository" model is a lot
easier to explain.  At least when I read your first "branch
group" proposal that was I thought was going on and I found it
quite sensible (and it maps more or less straightforwardly to
the way existing .git/refs/remotes is set up by default).