Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Nov 14, 2006, 19:47 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20061114194707.GH7201@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <87hcx1u934.wl%cworth@cworth.org>
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 08:22:39PM CET, Carl Worth wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
> For reference, the latest potential batch of new users that I'm > dealing with is the set of Fedora package maintainers who are looking > at replacing CVS for their tree of package-building scripts. They are > currently evaluating systems and liking the interface of hg. Here's > the top of the current thread: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-November/msg00030.html > > Here's the report about "git commit -a" confusion that led to my patch > above: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-November/msg00141.html > > And here's my reply where I suggest that git UI might still be > improved in these areas: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2006-November/msg00149.html
Hmm, did they (not) consider Cogito? They wouldn't have those issues. ;-)
--
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1