Re: imap.preformattedHTML and imap.sslverify

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Feb 8, 2010, 23:05 UTC
Message-ID: <7vaavj8h1k.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B7090C7.4040700@codeweavers.com>

Jeremy White <jwhite@codeweavers.com> writes:

Show 6 quoted lines

> I did confirm that your patch does work.
>
> However, I assumed that my original patch was rejected.  
> I never realized that it had been applied.
>
> That clearly means that no one has ever used this option.

Thanks. I didn't mean to witch-hunt (did I ever say "the originally submitted patches were untested"?), and I apologise if you took it that way. You were Cc'ed because as the origin of the patch you were likely to be using that feature.

I just wanted to make sure that the problem I thought I saw was real, and wanted to make sure that I was not overlooking subtleties in the current code people who are using the feature are relying upon.

Will apply to maint and merge upwards.