Re: [GSoC RFC PATCH 0/5] repo-info: add new command for retrieving repository info
- From
Lucas Seiki Oshiro <lucasseikioshiro@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 12, 2025, 20:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <2EB72983-BA77-47C3-9331-B08760B092C4@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqikl3mtx2.fsf@gitster.g>
> OK, that's understandable, other than that handling of trailing > commas looks somewhat inconsistent.
Ooops, it was typo. I'm using the json_writer functions
Show 18 quoted lines
>> Or in a plaintext format, like this: >> >> ~~~ >> $ git repo-info --format=plaintext >> sha1 >> files >> /git/dir >> /git/common-dir >> /git/toplevel >> /super/working/tree >> false >> false >> ~~~ > > This one is a bit questionable. > > Is it safe to assume that we will never have to deal with payload > controllable by the end-user that can have arbitrary byte values?
I was trying to follow the behavior of rev-parse, where we can do this:
git rev-parse --show-toplevel --is-bare-repository
and it prints both the top level repositority and whether it is a bare repository.
> It would be uncommon but possible for LF to be in one of these > pathnames
I tested here and this also happened with rev-parse:
$ git init 'my repo'
$ cd my\nrepo/ $ git rev-parse --show-toplevel /tmp/my repo
And this also happens passing other flags to rev-parse...
> This one is OK.
So, after reading your review, I though about other solution:
1. The user can provide only one field or no field 2. If the user provide only one field, repo-info will return only its contents 3. If the user don't provide any field, the default set of fields will be returned