Re: [PATCH 21/28] commit_packed_refs(): use a staging file separate from the lockfile
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 24, 2017, 17:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20170724170915.GD13924@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20170724165907.53zx657qmizgl4lb@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Hi,
Jeff King wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> This seems like the correct path to me. If the existing behavior is to > lock the referring symref, that seems like a violation of the lock > procedure in the first place. Because if "A" points to "B", we take > "A.lock" and then modify "B". But "B" may have any number of "A" links > pointing to it, eliminating the purpose of the lock. > > I thought we already did this, though. And that modifying HEAD (which > might be a symlink) required LOCK_NO_DEREF.
Yes, I believe the lockfile API already does so. Since this patch creates a ".new" file, not using the lockfile API, it doesn't benefit from that, though.
Thanks, Jonathan