Re: Performance issue: initial git clone causes massive repack

From: Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev@laposte.net>
Date: Apr 5, 2009, 00:05 UTC
Message-ID: <20090405000536.GA12927@vidovic>
In-Reply-To: <20090404220743.GA869@curie-int>

On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 03:07:43PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:

Show 5 quoted lines

> Our full repository conversion is large, even after tuning the
> repacking, the packed repository is between 1.4 and 1.6GiB. As of Feburary
> 4th, 2009, it contained 4886949 objects. It is not suitable for
> splitting into submodules either unfortunately - we have a lot of
> directory moves that would cause submodule bloat.

Actually, I'm not sure that a full portage tree repository would be the best thing to do. It would not be suitable in the long term and working on the repository/history would be a big mess. Why provide a such repo ? Or at least, why provide a such readable repo ?

IMHO, you should provide a repository per upstream package on the main server.

PS: what about cc'ing gentoo-scm list ?

-- 
Nicolas Sebrecht