Re: Bizarre missing changes (git bug?)
- From
- Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
- Date
- Jul 29, 2008, 12:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080729124827.GB14052@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807291339580.6791@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Most frequently this involves changes where the same change is merged > twice. [...]
You're not answering the question. You cite cases when you consider both the default and the full-history output incorrect from a usefulness point of view. The question is, what would the correct output be, from your point of view? What should be shown, and what shouldn't?
OG.