From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:48:27 GMT
Subject: Re: Bizarre missing changes (git bug?)
Message-ID: <20080729124827.GB14052@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807291339580.6791@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:32:14PM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Most frequently this involves changes where the same change is merged 
> twice. [...]

You're not answering the question.  You cite cases when you consider
both the default and the full-history output incorrect from a
usefulness point of view.  The question is, what would the correct
output be, from your point of view?  What should be shown, and what
shouldn't?

  OG.