Re: Bizarre missing changes (git bug?)
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jul 29, 2008, 03:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90807282015m7ce3da10h71dfee221c960332@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807281241180.6791@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Can we please get past this and look at what is required to produce the > correct history?
Roman - correct is --full-history -- any simplification that makes it easy on your eyes *is* a simplification. And consumers that want to do nice user-friendly simplification like gitk does can hang off the data stream.
> it's also possible to update it when merging/pulling new data.
If that's what you want to do, you can prototype it with a hook on fetch and commit. That is definitely an area that hasn't been explored - what nicer (but expensive) views on the history we have can be afforded by pre-computing things on fetch and commit hooks.
cheers,
m
-- martin.langhoff@gmail.com martin@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff