Re: Bizarre missing changes (git bug?)
- From
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- Date
- Jul 27, 2008, 23:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807271613440.3486@nehalem.linux-foundation.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807272101470.6791@localhost.localdomain>
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Roman Zippel wrote:
> > Why are you dismissing what I wrote without even giving it a second > thought? I didn't bother with the initial example, because it's so > simple, that it's no real challenge.
Did you try it? It really shouldn't be any simpler than anything else. And I dismissed what you wrote because the example you _did_ state was about something else entirely (ie apparently some giggle bug that simplifies things incorrectly).
> What did I do wrong that you rebuff me based on this secondary problem > (which I'm quite aware of, because it was me who mentioned in first place) > and giving the primary problem (which is the missing history) no > attention?
It's not missing history. It's all there in --full-history. The default is to give a reasonable simplification, and I told you what the simplification was, and it's perfectly conceptually fine - AND IT IS MUCH MORE EFFICIENT than the alternatives.
So I'm not seeing your point what-so-ever.
My point is:
- with full-history, you have it all, but it's useless in practice
- without full-history, it's useful in practice
You never gave any examples otherwise.
Linus