Re: Bizarre missing changes (git bug?)
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Jul 29, 2008, 05:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20080729053108.GH26997@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807281241180.6791@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:59:01AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Right now you're giving me the choice between a crappy incomplete history > or a crappy history full of useless information. That's it? As long as > your challenge involves being compared to crappy history, I'm not > interested. If the solution should involve a switch "--correct-history" > or I have to wait for the result, I don't care, because it's the correct > history I want. As long as you're trying to sell me crappy history I'm not > buying it. > > Can we please get past this and look at what is required to produce the > correct history?
You seem to be indicating here (and elsewhere in the thread) that there exists some history graph for which neither "git log" nor "git log --full-history" produces the output you want, but that there is some better output (even if it might take more time to compute).
Perhaps I am just slow, but I haven't been able to figure out what that history is, or what the "correct" output should be. Can you try to state more clearly what it is you are looking for?
-Peff