Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix git stash with skip-worktree entries
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 7 quoted lines
>> Yeah, I do not recall seeing any of the patches in the topic (nor
>> the cover letter). It is not clear to me what "lose" above means,
>> which is an indication that I didn't read the topic a month ago X-<.
>
> Sorry, in this context, "to lose a file" means that a `git stash` would
> record such a file as deleted. A subsequent `git stash apply` _would_
> then delete it.
That would be a good thing to explain in the log message.
Thanks.