Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fix git stash with skip-worktree entries
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 28, 2019, 02:33 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqpniha9a8.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1910272203360.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
Show 10 quoted lines
> Hi Junio, > > On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote: > >> My colleague Dan Thompson reported a bug in a sparse checkout, where git >> stash (after resolving merge conflicts and then making up their mind to >> stash the changes instead of committing them) would "lose" files (and files >> that were not even in the sparse checkout's cone!). > > I only realized _now_ that this patch has not made it anywhere.
Yeah, I do not recall seeing any of the patches in the topic (nor the cover letter). It is not clear to me what "lose" above means, which is an indication that I didn't read the topic a month ago X-<.
Did it even get any review by skip worktree bit experts back then?