Re: [PATCH 1/2] update-index: optionally leave skip-worktree entries alone
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Oct 28, 2019, 21:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1910282206081.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqq36fda3i8.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 38 quoted lines
> "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> > writes: > > > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > > > > While `git update-index` mostly ignores paths referring to index entries > > whose skip-worktree bit is set, in b4d1690df11 (Teach Git to respect > > skip-worktree bit (reading part), 2009-08-20), for reasons that are not > > entirely obvious, the `--remove` option was made special: it _does_ > > remove index entries even if their skip-worktree bit is set. > > I think that made sense to notice removal of the path, because > skip-worktree bit was not "apply --cached semantics instead of > looking at the working tree files". In other words, it was only > about contents inside the files, and not existence of paths. > > I am not offhand sure if it still makes sense; if I were being asked > to review that commit today, I suspect that I may be tempted to say > that we should ignore both contents change and presence change for > entries that have skip-worktree bit set. > > > However, in preparation for fixing a bug in `git stash` where it > > pretends that skip-worktree entries have actually been removed, we need > > a mode where `git update-index` leaves all skip-worktree entries alone, > > even if the `--remove` option was passed. > > We might want to make this the default eventually (is there a known > use case where the current behaviour makes sense, I wonder?), but > I agree that this is a safe thing to do at least for now. > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> > > --- > > Documentation/git-update-index.txt | 6 ++++++ > > builtin/update-index.c | 6 +++++- > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Isn't this something reasonably easy to guard against regression with > a test or two?
I sent out a v2 with tests added to 1/2.
Thanks, Dscho
Show 58 quoted lines
>
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/git-update-index.txt b/Documentation/git-update-index.txt
> > index 1c4d146a41..08393445e7 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/git-update-index.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/git-update-index.txt
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ SYNOPSIS
> > [--chmod=(+|-)x]
> > [--[no-]assume-unchanged]
> > [--[no-]skip-worktree]
> > + [--[no-]ignore-skip-worktree-entries]
> > [--[no-]fsmonitor-valid]
> > [--ignore-submodules]
> > [--[no-]split-index]
> > @@ -113,6 +114,11 @@ you will need to handle the situation manually.
> > set and unset the "skip-worktree" bit for the paths. See
> > section "Skip-worktree bit" below for more information.
> >
> > +
> > +--[no-]ignore-skip-worktree-entries::
> > + Do not remove skip-worktree (AKA "index-only") entries even when
> > + the `--remove` option was specified.
> > +
> > --[no-]fsmonitor-valid::
> > When one of these flags is specified, the object name recorded
> > for the paths are not updated. Instead, these options
> > diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c
> > index dff2f4b837..074d563df0 100644
> > --- a/builtin/update-index.c
> > +++ b/builtin/update-index.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ static int verbose;
> > static int mark_valid_only;
> > static int mark_skip_worktree_only;
> > static int mark_fsmonitor_only;
> > +static int ignore_skip_worktree_entries;
> > #define MARK_FLAG 1
> > #define UNMARK_FLAG 2
> > static struct strbuf mtime_dir = STRBUF_INIT;
> > @@ -381,7 +382,8 @@ static int process_path(const char *path, struct stat *st, int stat_errno)
> > * so updating it does not make sense.
> > * On the other hand, removing it from index should work
> > */
> > - if (allow_remove && remove_file_from_cache(path))
> > + if (!ignore_skip_worktree_entries && allow_remove &&
> > + remove_file_from_cache(path))
> > return error("%s: cannot remove from the index", path);
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -1013,6 +1015,8 @@ int cmd_update_index(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> > {OPTION_SET_INT, 0, "no-skip-worktree", &mark_skip_worktree_only, NULL,
> > N_("clear skip-worktree bit"),
> > PARSE_OPT_NOARG | PARSE_OPT_NONEG, NULL, UNMARK_FLAG},
> > + OPT_BOOL(0, "ignore-skip-worktree-entries", &ignore_skip_worktree_entries,
> > + N_("do not touch index-only entries")),
> > OPT_SET_INT(0, "info-only", &info_only,
> > N_("add to index only; do not add content to object database"), 1),
> > OPT_SET_INT(0, "force-remove", &force_remove,
>