Re: [PATCH 1/2] update-index: optionally leave skip-worktree entries alone
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Oct 29, 2019, 02:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqr22w70c2.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1910282206081.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>> Isn't this something reasonably easy to guard against regression with >> a test or two? > > I sent out a v2 with tests added to 1/2.
Good; that way, not just "stash" but anything that relies on update-index would be protected from regressions.
Thanks.