Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] update-index: optionally leave skip-worktree entries alone
- From
Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
- Date
- Nov 2, 2019, 23:03 UTC
- Message-ID
- <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.1911030002410.46@tvgsbejvaqbjf.bet>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqpnib567f.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>
Hi Junio,
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes: > > > I changed this locally to `keep-me`. But then I saw that you merged this > > patch pair to `next` already... Do you want an add-on patch, or revert > > it out of `next`, or leave as-is? > > > > I'd like to know because I still want to merge this into Git for Windows > > v2.24.0-rc2, and I would love to deviate as little as possible from > > git.git there. > > >... > > So: revert out of `next`, add-on patch, or leave as-is? > > Sorry for a late response. I was under the weather and mostly > offline for the past few days.
I hope you are feeling better?
> Whichever is easier for GGG is fine, but for the purpose of > resulting history, I think revert-replace would be the best.
Technically, GitGitGadget should be fine with reverting out and re-integrating. If not, that's a bug ;-)
Thanks for replacing, Dscho