Re: [PATCH v2] blame: report correct number of lines in progress when using ranges
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 8, 2022, 18:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqy20fmoes.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <9920b355-9003-e7c7-77ab-3432651674e9@iee.email>
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email> writes:
>> But I do not object to being more explicit. > > The core point though was that it can be misunderstood, thus avoiding > the indirection, as you say, makes it more explicit for the reader.
Yup. FWIW, I was saying that what the author wrote was not _wrong_ per-se. I agree that being explicit here (instead of hiding behind a pronoun) is an improvement.
Thanks.