Re: [PATCH v2] blame: report correct number of lines in progress when using ranges
- From
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
- Date
- Apr 5, 2022, 09:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <8622e48c-9f34-c644-4016-02c3795ac1e9@iee.email>
- In-Reply-To
- <b2f5d6af-8da1-3a3a-cc21-848c14a8fb98@gmail.com>
On 05/04/2022 08:34, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> On 05/04/22 01.21, Edmundo Carmona Antoranz wrote: >> When using ranges, use their sizes as the limit for progress >> instead of the size of the full file. >> > > The progress limit is defined by number of affected lines, right?
I'd also wondered about 'their', thinking it was 'the files', rather than 'the ranges' [within those files].
perhaps: s/their/range/
"When using ranges, use the range sizes as the limit for progress' ..
or maybe 'total range size'. -- Philip