Re: patch submission process, was Re: [PATCH v6 06/16] merge_recursive: abort properly upon errors

From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date: Aug 8, 2016, 22:36 UTC
Message-ID: <xmqqshuedh1i.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <6c937f79-2b82-619d-51fe-adccbe09bd66@alum.mit.edu>

Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:

> Is it *really* so insane to consider moving collaboration on the Git
> project to GitHub or some other similar platform?

I only know how "pull requests" and "issues" discussion in GitHub Web interface _currently_ looks like, so if you have even more wonderful thing in the works, I _might_ be swayed otherwise, but I do not think it is sane to expect that the same quality and quantity of reviews as we do here can be maintained with that thing.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.