Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] init: document `init.defaultBranch` better
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Dec 11, 2020, 05:59 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqsg8cnaqs.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAMP44s3mtCd9RnZdW7-HLcKVG13UW8u_1VNC0_7jByQRv61+vw@mail.gmail.com>
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 3:58 PM Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget > >> +repository. If not specified, fall back to the default name (currently >> +`master`, but that will be changed in the future; the name can be customized >> +via the `init.defaultBranch` configuration variable). > > Wait a second. The advice warning said "this is subject to change", > and the documentation says "that will be changed in the future". Which > is it? > > "I might give you a fine", and "I will give you a fine" are most > definitely not the same thing.
I think we say "this is subject to change" in other places, and I agree that this part should match to avoid confusing readers, especially the non-native ones like me.
If not specified, fall back to the default name (currently
`master`, but this is subject to change in the future; ...would be more consistent.