Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] SubmittingPatches: clarify 'git-contacts' location
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Apr 13, 2024, 01:26 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqle5ihx24.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cT4Jc-wvpZxoe_ZLBZ01-C7LTnbe968_33hwaEGeN+vtQ@mail.gmail.com>
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> writes:
> An alternative would be to deprecate and/or remove `git-contacts` from > "contrib" and instead point people at Felipe's `git-related`[1], which > is the direct parent[2] of `git-contacts`, as well as a more > functional drop-in replacement for `git-contacts`.
I am not sure it is wise to add an external dependency on a tool that is not very well known ([1] has only 68 stars), not packaged for distros [*] and is more or less dormant (the last update was April last year).
Unless the one we locally carry is vastly inadequate in comparison, I somehow doubt that it is a better alternative to ask our target audience to use it, than letting them use git-contacts from in-tree.
[Footnote]
* "git imerge" and "tig" are what I compare with to use as a yardstick, when trying to judge how well-known and easily obtainable a package related to us is.