Re: [PATCH 2/3] bundle.c: fix memory leak
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- Mar 10, 2015, 23:17 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqk2yoxx1u.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAGZ79kZ5=Q3WE6Ztr7PJ2Kv2xdKdCB2cD+_MH1GcqEDiZpU11w@mail.gmail.com>
Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
Show 27 quoted lines
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes: >> >>> The continue statements nearby also have an accompanying free(ref); >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> >>> --- >> >> I wonder what happens when dwim_ref() returned 2 or more, though. > > That should also be fixed I guess. I'll look into it. > > These one liner fixes are mostly done as a side project > having fun, just doing what the code analysis tools says, > sorry for not catching that one. > > Maybe instead of the reoccuring pattern > > free(ref); > continue; > > we could just have a > > goto cleanup > > which goes to the end of the loop where we have > the free anyway.
Yeah, I suspect that the end result may look more like that if you cover the dwim_ref() one as well.
Thanks.