Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] align the behavior when opening "packed-refs"

> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 01:50:06AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 09:31:09AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> 
>> > > Change in v5:
>> > >
>> > > 1. Improve the commit message in the first patch to be more clear:
>> > >     1. Talk about the current behavior, what error we would report if
>> > >        "packed-refs" is empty.
>> > >     2. To align with the runtime behavior, we should skip checking the
>> > >        content of "packed-refs".
>> > >     3. Why do we need to report to the user when the "packed-refs" is
>> > >        empty
>> > > 2. Fix grammar issue in the last patch.
>> > 
>> > The thread has gone quiet on this topic.  Is everybody happy with
>> > this version?
>> 
>> Yep, it looks good to me. Thanks.
>
> Didn't have anything else to add, either. Thanks!