Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] align the behavior when opening "packed-refs"

From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Date: May 23, 2025, 09:40 UTC
Message-ID: <aDBCdoNPkTq0xzOP@pks.im>
In-Reply-To: <20250522055006.GA1135327@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 01:50:06AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

Show 17 quoted lines

> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 09:31:09AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > > Change in v5:
> > >
> > > 1. Improve the commit message in the first patch to be more clear:
> > >     1. Talk about the current behavior, what error we would report if
> > >        "packed-refs" is empty.
> > >     2. To align with the runtime behavior, we should skip checking the
> > >        content of "packed-refs".
> > >     3. Why do we need to report to the user when the "packed-refs" is
> > >        empty
> > > 2. Fix grammar issue in the last patch.
> > 
> > The thread has gone quiet on this topic.  Is everybody happy with
> > this version?
> 
> Yep, it looks good to me. Thanks.

Didn't have anything else to add, either. Thanks!

Patrick