Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] packed-backend: fsck should allow an empty "packed-refs" file
- From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Date
- May 12, 2025, 17:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <xmqqh61pu4r9.fsf@gitster.g>
- In-Reply-To
- <20250512155654.GA1219668@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
Show 9 quoted lines
> It may be useful for fsck to detect this, though, even if the default > message severity is set to "info" or even "ignore. That would allow > people who know they are using modern Git to increase it themselves (I > don't expect normal users to do this, but it would probably be useful > for forges which run automated "fsck" across a lot of repos). > > And then the backwards-incompatible Git 3.0 thing would just be tweaking > the severity of the config (and in the meantime, it would help flush out > any unexpected instances people run into).
I came to make a same comment but the above has everything I wanted to say (and more).