Re: [PATCH v4 04/19] for-each-ref: add '--points-at' option
- From
Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
- Date
- Jun 22, 2015, 19:21 UTC
- Message-ID
- <vpqpp4nblc2.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAOLa=ZSd8KftLrRHBXY7Ch2KpVuFSb2DzCq0eLibAx1+bR9M1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote: >> 3 & 4 as a single patch may make more sense, if we were to tolerate the >> "let's copy & paste first and then later remove the duplicate" as a way to >> postpone touching "tag.c" side in order to first concentrate on for-each-ref. >> >> I have not formed a firm opinion on what the right split of the series is, but >> so far (assuming that the temporary duplication is the best we can do) what >> I am seeing in this series makes sense to me. >> >> Thanks. > > That would mean squashing 3&4, 6&7 and 10&11 also on similar lines.
I have a slight preference for keeping the pairs not squashed. This way, we have a clear separation "write reusable library code" / "use it". But I'm fine with squashing if others prefer.
-- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/